I’ve written about this before, but I think this is the best I’ve articulated it:
I’d love to have a discussion here about this idea. What do you think? Do you agree/disagree? Why?
I’ve written about this before, but I think this is the best I’ve articulated it:
I’d love to have a discussion here about this idea. What do you think? Do you agree/disagree? Why?
It is quite an old idea that instead of moving users to your product (it is hard) it is better to move your product to users (learn what users want and change the product).
Nice article Justin. I also enjoyed you discussing this on your “Build your SaaS” podcast. The topic certainly resonates as I keep thinking we’re in a pond and should be looking for a river. Whatever happened to “if you build it they will come”
Yes, Jordan Gal and Scott Bolinger recently discussed this as well:
The full episode is worth listening to:
I cannot actually understand what you advising/advocating. Many products represent a discontinuity with current practice.
Most innovative products start in a niche.
@skmurphy those are examples of scientific advancements/innovations (often funded by the government or academia). They’re not great proxies for bootstrappers starting a business with limited resources.
A few examples:
Generally, bootstrappers shouldn’t be really inventing anything. That’s too resource + time-intensive for someone self-funding a business.
Bootstrapped founders have to identify a need that customers already know they have. (The goal with bootstrapping is not really to change the way people behave).
Instead, we’re trying to recognize where people are already in motion and build solutions for the direction they’re headed.
We don’t create the waves; we ride them.